A blog on torts from a Tennessee trial lawyer
Footnote: This is another nicely designed blog from lexBlog.
Tracking new and intriguing Web sites for the legal profession.
"They are all bloggers with a track record of being able to explain complex legal issues in ways that others can understand. They find their backchannel conversations about technology, the law, their profession, and society pretty interesting, and they hope that by having these discussions in public — and inviting your participation — everyone concerned can learn a thing or two more than they otherwise would."In addition to Denise, the contributors are Dennis M. Kennedy, Tom Mighell, Marty Schwimmer and Ernest Svenson.
"Until now, site specific (or vertical) searching has been a very tedious process - especially for searching government websites. Users need to know all of the thousands of sites available, as well as the specific URL domain or even sub domain address of each and every website. Then, for every search, the user has to type BY HAND both the search terms AND the address of the website they want to search (and type it all correctly, of course). ...The cost of using Elegus is $14.95 a month or $149.50 a year. A seven-day free trial is offered, as well as a free demo. I have not fully tested the site, but I can see that it would be of value to legal professionals who perform extensive research using government Web sites.
"Searching across multiple websites is an even bigger problem, because each grouping depends on the domain and sub domain makeup of the websites themselves. There is no standard practice for grouping government websites. Some websites are sub domains that can be grouped within larger domains, while others are individual domains that need to be entered on their own.
"With Elegus, all of the legwork of finding and entering domain, sub domain, and group information is done for you. You simply enter your search terms once, and then click on any button to instantly search whichever website or group you like."
Labels: Supreme Court
"It contains a substantial quantity of reference material and many starting points to online research. I will be adding more content of that nature along the way, so you may want to return to the site from time to time even if you receive the blog posts by RSS or email. I will be sure to mention major additions to the static content in blog posts, as they occur."Notably, the site includes the full text of all 423 ethics opinions and all 62 unauthorized practice opinions issued by the Kentucky Bar Association since 1962. This is the same collection that Cowgill previously published through a site called the Kentucky Legal Ethics Library.
"I wonder how you reach the conclusion that the family 'would donate most of the $750,000' ($740,000 per the Globe) to animal charities. At the press conference, according to the Globe, attorney John G. Swomley -- who was at pains to portray the suit as not a money grab -- said the family plans on 'keeping $200,000, plus enough to pay for four years of college for Kyle and his brother Alec, 10'. At, say, Boston College (currently $37,413 room and board, and who knows how high the figure'll be by the time the boys are grown?) that amounts to roughly another $300,000 ($37K x four years x 2 boys), leaving $240,000 of the settlement. And assuming Swomley takes, say, 30% of the $740,000 = $220,000 for his fee, that would leave a grand total of $20,000 to go to the animal charities -- assuming there aren't expenses and that sort of thing to be charged against the remainder.I suspect Olson and I are both off in the math. To cover college, the family most likely would set aside a sum in an annuity or similar investment. That sum would be less than the full cost of college but, given that one son is already 13, probably more than I had thought. What's worse, my comment failed to factor in attorney's fees. All tolled, Olson is correct that "most of" is probably wrong and the amount left for charity would most likely be significantly less.
"You're probably right that I should have expanded my three-sentence summary of the case at Overlawyered to delve further into these matters, since they afford valuable insight into how lawyers can manage the p.r. aspects of their cases."
Dennis Kennedy reports availability of the first two in a series of e-discovery webinars he is producing for the Merrill Corporation. The webinars run 10 to 15 minutes and cover specific areas of electronic discovery. Available so far are:
"For lawyers, in some ways the LL.M. is the equivalent of what an MBA is for business people. Many law firms prefer candidates holding an LL.M. degree as it indicates that a lawyer has enjoyed advanced legal training and is able to work in a multinational legal environment."The site allows you to browse through lists of programs arranged by location or search programs by keyword. A list of the most popular programs arranges them by how often they have been viewed. (The most popular is the University of London's External Programme.) The LLM Guide also features a discussion board, a personal watch list and a tool for requesting more information about a program.
"While CRISP-ER is optimized to research projects involving biological weapons agents, it can be used by anyone with an interest in National Institutes of Health research, for example, to research spending on biotechnology, biodiversity, specific diseases, or in specific locations."
"The basic premise is this: the U.S. government provides lots of neat resources, more and more of which can be found on the internet. Basically, we’re just going to try and find the coolest stuff there is and post it here. After all, you paid for it… dammit, you better get some use out of it."[Thanks to Tom Mighell for pointing this out.]
Judge (regarding Curly): "What's the matter with him?"